Books Show Off 5 (Recap)

I can only speak for me, but I had a great time last night at Books Show Off 5, which was graciously hosted by the Waterstones on Tottenham Court Road. People spoke on an eclectic range of topics, including Tolkien, Harold and Maude, elegiac dog poetry, inappropriate Latin, and sculptures that look like they’re having sex with angels. Nothing I said was that nearly that interesting, but I did manage to talk about Star Trek, porn stars, and Ernest Hemingway all in under nine minutes. Obviously what I was really talking about was writing.

insta1
Photo by Steven Cross

Specifically, what I talked about were all the steps involved in getting a book published–and the fact that there are so many more than you think there are until you’ve actually done it. But this was a nice reminder that we’re getting much closer to the finish line with Villains. We still have to figure out cover art and what goes on the dust jacket and a lot of other stuff that falls under the category of “How do we market this thing?” But in T-minus six months, it should be facing out on a shelf in a bookstore somewhere near you. And that will be an exciting day indeed (for me at least).

M

First pass proof!

This fat stack of paper arrived from the folks at Flatiron Books today. Now’s when we go through the whole MS with a fine-tooth comb, looking for every last little fix and adjusting the formatting where needed. But this is pretty much what the inside of the hardcover will look like, and that’s exciting.

insta23

I’ll be hard at work on this for the next week or so. I’ve gone through Act I already this morning and it’s a bit like an out-of-body experience, because it’s been a while since I read through the whole text–long enough that I can almost pretend I didn’t write it, and read it as a reader.

Getting closer all the time.

RBM

My wonderful editor Christine Kopprasch just sent me a photo of If We Were Villains in its newest incarnation as an RBM–no cover art yet, but I am beyond excited to see this. It’s starting to look like a real book!

rbm

#TenThingsNotToSayToAWriter

This hashtag is currently trending on Twitter, and while most of the writers in the Twittersphere are using it to vent their frustration, some words of wisdom have also come up in discussion. One of the most common complaints among writers seems to be that people who don’t write assume, as soon as you identify yourself as a writer, that writing is merely a hobby–something you do because you have enough money or enough free time that you don’t have to hold a “real” job.  In my experience it’s been almost exactly the opposite. Writing is my real job, and anything else I’ve done to make money has simply served to support my fledgling career as a writer. Understandably, it’s annoying when anyone says, “So you’re not working.”

What’s most interesting to me about this discussion is the criteria the general public assigns to “real” writers. The line of inquiry to determine whether or not you’re a real writer usually goes something like this: “So you’re a writer. Anything I would have read? Why haven’t I heard of you? Can I buy it on Amazon?” Basically, unless you’ve been on a New York Times Bestseller list, you don’t get to call yourself a writer without being given the third degree on a daily basis. Someone watching the debate unfold was curious enough to ask Joanne Harris–author of Chocolat and Gentlemen and Players (a personal favorite of mine), among others–why these questions are perceived as rude. Her answer was pithy and on point:

“If someone tells you they’re a professional writer, it’s generally impolite to then assume it’s a hobby…”

What, then, should be the benchmark for a “real” writer? Publication? Sales? Certainly there’s a difference between a published novelist and someone who’s writing Star Trek fanfiction in their spare time. But how do we make the distinction? Harris goes on to explain that it may be more complicated than Twitter has, thus far, been willing to allow. The simple act of writing doesn’t necessarily make you a writer, but you don’t have to be J. K. Rowling to call yourself a writer either. There’s a difference, she says, between learning to think of yourself as a writer, and telling other people that’s what you are:

harris

Perhaps it’s time we start approaching the term “writer” with fluidity in mind. If you write, indeed, you are a writer. It’s not unlike being an athlete–it’s something you can do and call yourself without receiving any sort of paycheck, or something you can make millions doing and add the designation of “professional” to the title. But until such a time comes when the terminology is clearer, let’s try giving writers the benefit of the doubt. If someone identifies themselves to you as a writer, it’s likely that’s they’ve gone through at least part of the process Joanne Harris is talking about. They’re confident enough in their craft to call themselves a writer, and they probably don’t do it lightly. So, if you’re curious, avail yourself of the #TenThingsNotToSayToAWriter tag on Twitter, have a good laugh, and know what questions not to ask next time you find yourself face to face with another inkslinger.

Announcing my first novel!

So thrilled to share the news that my first novel, If We Were Villains,  is going to be published by Flatiron Books–an imprint of Macmillan–sometime in the next year or so.

This book has been my life for almost two years now, and after so much writing, editing, revising, and so many long conversations with my fabulous agent at DCL, I’m both thrilled and humbled to say that this story is coming to life! I’m so lucky to be working with Flatiron Books, and between my wonderful agent and now my equally wonderful editor, I couldn’t have asked to be in better hands. We’ve got a long way to go yet, but I can’t even articulate how exciting it is to be taking the next step down the road to publication.

More soon!

M